Re: [MISC] Noget stærkere end GPL? (Re: Ximian forstår ikke GPL?)

[Jacob Sparre Andersen <sslug@sslug>]

Peter Makholm skrev:

> Andreas Bach Aaen <sslug@sslug> writes:
> 
> > Det interesante for mig er om man har brug for noget, der er stærkere 
> > end GPL f.eks. en EmbeddedGPL licens, der kræver, at der kan købes 
> 
> Hvis jeg skal prøve at lade som om at jeg bryder mig om
> GPL, så finder jeg web-hullet langt mere alarmerende.

Enig. Jeg mener at GPL er nær ved at være til grin, hvis man
ikke på en eller anden måde inkluderer noget der svarer til
den opklarende bemærkning til "adacgi"s licensbetingelser:

   As a clarification, when this library is used in a server
   serving a client (such as a user browser invoking a
   server program), for purposes of this license the client
   is executing the program, even when this execution occurs
   remotely.  After all, the client sends the program input,
   causes the program to execute, and receives program
   output. As a consequence, if you make any modifications
   to this library, you MUST make those modifications
   available to all users of clients under the terms of this
   license.  As described in the LGPL, those clients then
   have certain rights to redistribute the library.

Men man kan selvfølgelig satse på at dette er en selvfølge.

Jacob
-- 
"We will be restoring normality as soon as we are sure what is normal anyway."